10 Years · 2016 — 2026
Resource library
Policy / Framework

Limited Use of Evaluative Evidence in Public Policy, Planning and Voluntary National Review (VNR) Development - Policy Brief

January 2023 This policy brief is a succinct summary of findings from the discussion paper titled VNRs and SDG evaluations in Anglophone Africa and Latin America: A mapping of common challenges and emerging good practices (2022) by DEval and CLEAR-AA and CLEAR-LAC. The policy brief is important because it recomme…

Read inline
Limited Use of Evaluative Evidence in Public Policy, Planning and Voluntary National Review (VNR) Development - Policy Brief
/ 4
110%
PDF
Ayabulela Dlakavu1 (ayabulela.dlakavu@wits.ac.za) and Dirk Hoffmann2 (dirk.hoffmann@deval.org)
Executive Summary

The UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a development tool, with a detailed follow-up and review

mechanism, guided by a global indicator framework and prominently positioned in Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs).

Within this context, however, program evaluation only plays a minor role. This policy brief analyses the position of

program evaluation in public policy, development planning and VNR development processes of eight countries in Africa

and Latin America. The brief is based on a discussion paper produced jointly by the German Institute for Development

Evaluation (DEval), the Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results-Anglophone Africa (CLEAR-AA) and the Centre

for Learning on Evaluation and Results-Latin America and the Caribbean (CLEAR-LAC) in 2022. This paper found that

program evaluation is marginalized in VNR development, a key international tool for assessing UN member nations’

progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Through document analysis and key informant

interviews in the sampled countries, the paper finds that the marginal position of program evaluation vis-à-vis VNR

development is linked to a combination of structural and operational issues. These include lack of internalization

and entrenchment of the SDGs in public policy and planning cycles and/or processes of governments; lack of focus

on the VNR process by evaluation stakeholders; the VNR development guidelines’ quantitative bias; and emerging

evaluation practice in certain countries. This brief concludes by recommending five remedial policies for addressing

the marginalized position of evaluation in VNRs.

1 Twende Mbele, formerly with CLEAR-AA

2 German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval)

LIMITED USE OF EVALUATIVE EVIDENCE IN

PUBLIC POLICY, PLANNING AND VOLUNTARY

NATIONAL REVIEW (VNR) DEVELOPMENT

Recommendations for governments,

evaluation communities and ECD stakeholders

POLICY BRIEF

About this brief

This Policy Brief is a succinct summary of findings from a recently completed

research study on the role of evaluations in the development of country

voluntary national review reports (DEval, CLEAR-AA and CLEAR-LAC. 2022.

“VNRs and SDG evaluations in Anglophone Africa and Latin America: A mapping

of common challenges and emerging good practices”. German Institute for

Development Evaluation, Bonn. The policy brief proffers recommendations on

how to create an enabling environment for a greater role of evaluation reports

and evidence in VNR development.

Suggested Citation:
Dlakavu, A.and Hoffmann, D. 2023. “Limited use of
evaluative evidence in public policy, planning and Voluntary National Review

(VNR) development. Recommendations for governments, evaluation

communities and ECD stakeholders.”
Centers for Learning on Evaluation and Results
ANGLOPHONE AFRICA
Financial support from:
Use the toolbar to navigate pages, zoom, search, rotate, print or open in fullscreen.

January 2023

This policy brief is a succinct summary of findings from the discussion paper titled VNRs and SDG evaluations in Anglophone Africa and Latin America: A mapping of common challenges and emerging good practices (2022) by DEval and CLEAR-AA and CLEAR-LAC. The policy brief is important because it recommends five remedial policies for addressing the marginalised position of evaluation in VNR development. The recommendations are targeted and government policymakers, parliaments, evaluation stakeholders, the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD) institutions.

Report NameLimited Use of Evaluative Evidence in Public Policy, Planning and Voluntary National Review (VNR) Development – Policy BriefPartnerDEval, CLEAR-AA and Twende Mbele.AuthorsDirk Hoffmann and Ayabulela Dlakavu CategoriesEvidence Use, Publications, Twende, Twende Mbele Share